PERBANDINGAN KECENDERUNGAN PENELITIAN PENDIDIKAN MATEMATIKA DI INDONESIA DAN AUSTRALIA
Sari
This article discusses the comparison of trends in mathematics education research in Indonesia and Australia. There are significant differences in research approaches, research focuses, and issues addressed in both countries. Mathematics education research in Indonesia often focuses on improving teacher capabilities, the use of technology in mathematics learning, and the influence of teaching approaches on mathematics learning outcomes. In Australia, research also involves studying mathematics curriculum, effective teaching strategies, inclusion issues in mathematics learning, and the use of technology in teaching. The research approaches also differ, with Indonesia tending to use quantitative approaches and Australia using both quantitative and qualitative approaches. This article provides valuable insights for the development of mathematics education in both countries. By learning from and sharing experiences with each other, both countries can leverage their strengths to enhance the quality of mathematics education at the national level.
Kata Kunci
Teks Lengkap:
PDF (English)Referensi
Alfieri, L., Brooks, P. J., Aldrich, N. J., & Tenenbaum, H. R. (2011). Does Discovery-Based Instruction Enhance Learning? Journal of Educational Psychology, 103(1), 1–18.https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021017
Department of Education and Training. (2019). National Mathematics Curriculum. Australia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.education.gov.au/national-mathematics-curriculum
Ellerton, N., & Clements, M. (2017). The Status of Mathematics Education Research: An Australian Context. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(4), 359–379.https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-017-0190-z
Iskandar, E., & Daswatia, D. (2019). Enhancing Pre-Service Mathematics Teachers’ Mathematical Content Knowledge through Lesson Study and Revisiting SMP Textbooks in Indonesia. Journal on Mathematics Education, 11(2), 217–230.https://dx.doi.org/10.22342/jme.11.2.7617.217-230
Makonye, J. W., Chawane, S. H., & Ramodike, K. S. (2018). Promoting Mathematical Literacy: A Review of Research-Oriented Mathematics Teaching and Learning Strategies. Pythagoras, 39(2), 1–12.https://doi.org/10.4102/pythagoras.v39i2.375
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Results (Volume III): What School Life Means for Students’ Lives. OECD Publishing.https://doi.org/10.1787/acd78851-en
Pratiwi, R. K., & Meiliasari, M. (2018). The Effectiveness of Using Videos on Mathematics Learning Outcomes Viewed from Students’ Self-Confidence. Journal of Education and Practice, 9(20), 123–129.
Queensland Curriculum & Assessment Authority. (n.d.). Mathematics. Australia. Retrieved fromhttps://www.qcaa.qld.edu.au/senior/subjects/mathematics
Ramya, S., & Syaifullah, S. (2019). Developing Mathematical Literacy in Undergraduate Mathematics Education. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1157, 1–10.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1157/4/042002
Saregar, A., & Putra, Z. (2019). Students’ Mathematical Connection Abilities and Thinking Process in Solving Mathematical Problem Based on Learning Values. Journal on Mathematics Education, 10(1), 45–56.https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.10.1.5776.45-56
Setiowati, B., & Sulaiman, R. (2019). The Roles of Mathematics Teachers in Developing Students Achievement and Creativity through Realistic Mathematics Education Approach. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education, 14(1), 21–32.
Supriyadi, S., Nindyaningrum, P., & Sutikno, S. (2020). Mathematics E-Learning Media Utilizing Motion Graphic to Enhance Learning Outcome. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1521, 1–8.https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1521/3/032019
Transforming the Teaching of Mathematics Using Technology. (2019). Educational Review, 71(1), 84–86.https://doi.org/10.1080/00131911.2018.1469133
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.36764/jc.v7i2.1165
Refbacks
- Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.
##submission.license.cc.by4.footer##
JURNAL CURERE (Jurnal Ilmiah Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Quality) indexed by:
